🔗 Share this article

The movie boasts a impressive ensemble, depicting the real-life tale of coach Ingle, who mentored a brash Yorkshire teenager from Yemeni migrant parents. Known as “Prince” Naseem Hamed, the fighter was coached to stand up to racist bullies and transformed into a media-friendly titleholder in the 1990s. Ingle cultivated his showboating arrogance and powerful punches, but after becoming rich, Hamed betrayed his coach, excluding him and turning him into a blend of Falstaff and Broadway Danny Rose.

Performers and Roles

Brosnan portrays Ingle; Amir El-Masry takes on the part of the prince, and Stephens is the assertive promoter Warren, who recognized the potential that Ingle had uncovered.

Where the Movie Falls Short

Yet, the film honestly misses the fighter’s fancy footwork: the boxing sequences flow well, but the all-important drama in between is consistently flat and monotonous. There is no nuance or light and shade in the depiction of the protagonist himself, and El-Masry, an otherwise outstanding performer, doesn’t get the opportunity to show any subtlety or much of what might make his role really interesting – even though he’s obviously been working out and looks very plausible in the boxing arena.

Problems with Script and Sound

The story is often burdened by utilitarian, explanatory dialogue that tell you precisely what is happening and what we are supposed to be thinking (“You started your career at seven years old …”). It is the kind of dialogue that streaming-TV producers call “second-screen”, ensuring you understand what’s unfolding while you’re viewing the movie but also checking your device. Additionally, the score is overbearing, sometimes nearly overwhelming, especially in the scene where the boxer gets overexcited visiting the promoter in his palatial home.

Performances and Key Moments

Although the leads do their considerable utmost, their relationship doesn’t quite ignites, and the big set-piece fight scenes are often anticlimactically cut short. The most important moment is surely when, provoked beyond endurance in the gym one day by the boxer as a misguided “elder”, Ingle actually offers to get in the ring and fight him. All present in the gym is shocked and uncomfortable. How exactly is this extremely unwise confrontation going to play out? How precisely the ending? Certainly the champion is going to kill him? Alternatively will he sentimentally hold back? It’s not clear.

Highlights and Humor

This isn’t to imply that there are no some good moments. The actor elicits humor when his character tells a journalist what he’s instructing the youths from his neighborhood: to reject prejudice and when you meet a offender, “Hit them in the bollocks”. It’s funny too when Hamed fidgets at the ridiculous stunts Ingle makes him do in the beginning: posing as the “beast from the East”.

Storyline and Final Thoughts

Regarding the rift, the movie shows this as being worsened by a revealing book that the trainer is allegedly written (a plot point evidently modified from another source), and there is an intriguingly imagined last discussion – although the heartfelt homage that the boxer is supposed to have given to his mentor after his death is merely referenced in the closing credits, and not dramatised on screen. There is interesting material in this film, but the punches don’t land.

Giant was shown at the festival and is in British and Irish cinemas from 9 January.